<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DCRepublican.com &#187; Iran</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dcrepublican.com/category/news/international/iran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dcrepublican.com</link>
	<description>Inside the Beltway Perspective on Just About Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:58:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Iran Responsible for the Escalation of the Afghan War?</title>
		<link>http://dcrepublican.com/2009/06/12/is-iran-responsible-for-the-escalation-of-the-afghan-war/</link>
		<comments>http://dcrepublican.com/2009/06/12/is-iran-responsible-for-the-escalation-of-the-afghan-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J. Forrest Creecy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcrepublican.com/?p=991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently came across an interesting article in the Army Times which denotes a disturbing caveat to the escalation of the war in Afghanistan. While the media continues to dwell on the economy and the boo-hoo stories of those who can’t afford a digital cable conversion box, the violence in Afghanistan has gone through the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently came across an interesting article in the Army Times which denotes a disturbing caveat to the escalation of the war in Afghanistan. While the media continues to dwell on the economy and the boo-hoo stories of those who can’t afford a digital cable conversion box, the violence in Afghanistan has gone through the roof and US casualties are multiplying at a staggering geometric rate. Far be it for me to draw attention away from important matters like the new American Idol, but here is what I see in the latest trends.</p>
<p><a href="http://dcrepublican.com/2009/06/12/is-iran-responsible-for-the-escalation-of-the-afghan-war/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>The Army Times article details the recent revelation that certain Farsi speaking insurgent groups have suddenly become equipped with body armor and kevlar helmets as well as vastly improved battlefield tactics and, shockingly, improved marksmanship. Coupled with the huge increase in IED attacks since the fighting season began in the spring, particularly the sharply growing presence of the state-of-the-art EFPs, leads me to believe that the war is about to take an ugly turn for the worse. I think we have a new villain entering the fray in the form of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard (IRG) who, with or without the consent of the Iranian leadership, have taken it upon themselves to institute a major policy shift with regard to Afghanistan.</p>
<p><span id="more-991"></span></p>
<p>What has led me to this conclusion despite the DoDs hesitation to come out and verify my hunch? I suppose it is a great deal of speculation considering that there is not a whole lot of hard evidence on the ground to substantiate the theory. However, it does not take a genius to read between the lines. Let us start with the change in battlefield conditions in Afghanistan.</p>
<p>As covered in the Army Times article, US forces recently engaged a large insurgent group in the northwest corner of Afghanistan that possessed advanced equipment to include body armor and kevlar helmets. The soldiers on the ground reported that this group was not fighting like the typical insurgents and used conventional tactics and displayed vastly improved marksmanship (a real surprise considering it is well known gospel that just about everybody in the Middle East can’t shoot for shit). Did I also mention that these folks spoke Farsi? What do these things tell us?</p>
<p>First off, this merry band of cracker jack fucks have some serious financial backing. Body armor and helmets cost a great deal of money, and it may shock some people to know that body armor costs a great deal more than weapons in that part of the world. Whereas one can buy an AK-47 or even RPG for less than $100, body armor will put you back thousands.</p>
<p>Second, someone is taking the time, effort and resources to train these people and values them enough to give them protection. Generally, groups like the Taliban use the peasants that flock to them as cannon fodder. Moreover, the various tribes allied to the Taliban have a history of fighting NATO forces and then becoming disinterested and leaving the conflict as rapidly as they came. This is not a departure from Afghan norms, however the presence of semi-professional soldiers bent on a semi-conventional conflict with US forces (when it suits them) is a radical shift from the seasonal and ad hoc martial tendencies of the typical Afghan rebel.</p>
<p>Finally, though the presence of Farsi speakers is not, in itself, atypical (considering that many tribes speak it in the northwest as well as Uzbek and Tajik groups) , the fact that THESE well armed, and equipped fighters were speaking Farsi is a red flag. We have seen these types of fighters in Iraq and it is well known that they were trained and funded by the Revolutionary Guard. The fighters in Afghanistan fit the bill to the tee.</p>
<p>And what of the increased IED activity? This also lends credence to the notion that an Iranian finger is in the pudding. Historically, the Afghan way of war has been one direct confrontation with enemy forces. This held true through the Soviet War and up to the current conflict.</p>
<p>Anyone that has even a modicum of knowledge about Afghanistan is aware that the Afghans are a martial people that practices warfare on foreigners and each other as a matter of course. Many tribes are built around a cult of personal bravery and victory and, unlike the Iraqis, relish a good firefight. The trend toward the skulking and cowardly act of IED planting is a marked shift from everything we know and have seen from the Afghans to this point. It is either a move in the direction of pragmatism on their part, or an indication that new, non-Afghan groups are increasing their influence in the theatre. Again, the indicators are pointed squarely in the direction of the Revolutionary Guard who have practiced and perfected IED tactics in Iraq.</p>
<p>So if it is indeed the IRG what does this say about the future course of the war? Traditionally, Iran has had little interest in getting involved in Afghanistan and even less love for the Taliban (a Sunni group). Iran’s involvement has been minimal thus far and the intelligence agency most linked to foreign fighters has been the Pakistani ISI maintaining contacts with its former Taliban protégés. If Tehran has decided to take a more direct and overt approach in Afghanistan it would signal a major policy shift. Such a shift would be indicative of three major factors that may have contributed to the decision making process.</p>
<p>1) Their efforts in Iraq have failed and they need a new proxy war, to continue their fight against the great Satan.</p>
<p>2) The weakness of the Afghan central government has become more pronounced as the idiot Karzi has made no progress at unifying the nation and it would be possible to pick up the pieces in the event of a US withdrawal despite a resurgent Taliban.</p>
<p>3) The American people, saddled with their perceived state of malaise and cultural decay, are far less willing to stomach an escalated fight than they have been and continue to grow restless for peace despite the utter lack of sacrifice on their part. The Iranians are no doubt seeing which way the wind is blowing and may feel that the proper application of moderate resources could push the US and NATO public over the edge and effect a withdrawal.</p>
<p>Iranian involvement in Afghanistan at this stage may actually be a low risk, high reward situation. US and NATO withdrawal from the Afghan theatre would increase Iran’s own standing in the region as well as signify a victory for the forces of Islam over the imperialist and decadent pigs from the Christian West. If the US and NATO were to leave in defeat it would be an unmitigated disaster for the civilized peoples of the world. The defeat of the Soviet Army in the 1980’s at the hands of Islamic fighters served to greatly embolden Jihadists around the world and was the definitive and formative event in the creation of groups like Al Qaeda and the Taliban. What would a victory over the Great Satan lead to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dcrepublican.com/2009/06/12/is-iran-responsible-for-the-escalation-of-the-afghan-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Kyl Invites Geert Wilders to Washington to present Fitna</title>
		<link>http://dcrepublican.com/2009/02/23/jon-kyl-invites-geert-wilders-to-washington-to-present-fitna/</link>
		<comments>http://dcrepublican.com/2009/02/23/jon-kyl-invites-geert-wilders-to-washington-to-present-fitna/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DC Republican</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Across the US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltway Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geert Wilders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jihad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Kyl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netherlands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcrepublican.com/?p=795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an interesting story that might get buried in everything else that is happening in Washington this week. It looks like Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ) has invited Geert Wilders, the Dutch film maker and politician, to present the film Fitna to the United States Senate later this week. For those of you unaware with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting story that might get buried in everything else that is happening in Washington this week.</p>
<p>It looks like Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ) <a href="http://www.radionetherlands.nl/news/international/6186794/Wilders-takes-IFitnaI-to-US" target="_blank">has invited</a> Geert Wilders, the Dutch film maker and politician, to present the film <em>Fitna</em> to the United States Senate later this week.</p>
<p>For those of you unaware with this film, it has stirred up international controversy, as it explores Qur&#8217;anic motivations for terrorism in the Netherlands and beyond.</p>
<p>If you have yet to see Fitna, here is some of it:</p>
<div><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="420" height="339" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x4vj81" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="420" height="339" src="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x4vj81" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
<strong><a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x4vj81">FITNA (ENGLISH)</a></strong><br />
<em>by <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/tongeren92">tongeren92</a></em></div>
<p>It should be expected that this will draw some protest in Washington and beyond.</p>
<p><em>Update: Glad to see this story has recieved a good deal of <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/23/geert-wilders-in-dc-on-friday/trackback/" target="_blank">attention</a>! </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dcrepublican.com/2009/02/23/jon-kyl-invites-geert-wilders-to-washington-to-present-fitna/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain addresses AIPAC Policy Conference</title>
		<link>http://dcrepublican.com/2008/06/02/mccain-addresses-aipac-policy-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://dcrepublican.com/2008/06/02/mccain-addresses-aipac-policy-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DC Republican</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Across the US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign '08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcrepublican.com/2008/06/02/mccain-addresses-aipac-policy-conference/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is McCain going to dominate the pro-Israel community? Here is the latest from the AIPAC Policy Conference, and I&#8217;ll have more on this later this evening: McCain Emphasizes Importance of U.S.-Israel Alliance Senator John McCain (R-AZ), the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, opened AIPAC Policy Conference 2008 in Washington, D.C. in front of more than 6,500 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is McCain going to dominate the pro-Israel community? Here is <a href="http://aipac.org/130.asp#12736" target="_blank">the latest</a> from the AIPAC Policy Conference, and I&#8217;ll have more on this later this evening:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>McCain Emphasizes Importance of U.S.-Israel Alliance</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://aipac.org/images/newsphotos/McCainOpeningPlenary.jpg" align="right" height="139" hspace="3" vspace="3" width="204" />Senator John McCain (R-AZ), the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, opened AIPAC Policy Conference 2008 in Washington, D.C. in front of more than 6,500 pro-Israel activists from all 50 states.</p>
<p>Sen. McCain said that Iran must be stopped from acquiring nuclear weapons and reaffirmed his support of a strong U.S.-Israel relationship.</p>
<p>“My friends, as the people of Israel know better than most, the safety of free people can never be taken for granted,” McCain said. “And in a world full of dangers, Israel and the United States must always stand together.”</p>
<p>The Democratic candidates for president, Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) will address Policy Conference attendees on the morning of June 4.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dcrepublican.com/2008/06/02/mccain-addresses-aipac-policy-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran Announces Massive Increase In Nuclear Capabilities</title>
		<link>http://dcrepublican.com/2008/04/09/iran-announces-massive-increase-in-nuclear-capabilities/</link>
		<comments>http://dcrepublican.com/2008/04/09/iran-announces-massive-increase-in-nuclear-capabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DC Republican</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dcrepublican.com/2008/04/09/iran-announces-massive-increase-in-nuclear-capabilities/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced that Iran has increased its capacity to enrich uranium dramatically. Without a doubt, this will bring them one step closer to having the ability to produce nuclear weapons. From the Islamic Republic News Agency: President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Tuesday that Iran&#8217;s nuclear program belongs to all humanity. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced that <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/04/08/iran.nuclear/index.html?iref=newssearch" target="_blank">Iran has increased its capacity</a> to enrich uranium dramatically. Without a doubt, this will bring them one step closer to having the ability to produce nuclear weapons.</p>
<p>From the <a href="http://www2.irna.com/en/news/view/line-24/0804099672000426.htm" target="_blank">Islamic Republic News Agency</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Tuesday that Iran&#8217;s nuclear program belongs to all humanity.</p>
<p>Speaking in the special ceremony marking Iran&#8217;s National Nuclear Day, he said the country&#8217;s nuclear program is regarded as the most significant event in the contemporary era.<img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/18/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad.jpg/187px-Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad.jpg" alt="Ahmadinejad Iran" align="right" height="249" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="187" /></p>
<p>Iran has successfully tested new cheaper nuclear devices in smaller dimensions that are five fold faster than the present models, he said.</p>
<p>The news on installations of several thousands of centrifuges is minor than the technological breakthrough Iran has made, said the president.</p>
<p>&#8220;We have attained remarkable achievements and success in production of magnetic alloy with new devices,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our new technological achievements will make a breakthrough in the country&#8217;s industrial sector in the near future,&#8221; said the president.</p>
<p>All are well aware of the fact that Iran&#8217;s nuclear program has turned to the most significant event in the contemporary era which goes beyond geographical borders to which the world calculations have tied up, he said.</p>
<p>Big powers believe that they have monopolized the nuclear energy and they can trample upon the rights of other nations, he said.</p>
<p>Iranian nation did not pay attention to their hue and cry and overcame all sanctions and with reliance upon almighty God and the youth fully mastered the nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, said the president.</p>
<p>Iran&#8217;s nuclear technology is totally indigenous and no one can deprive us from such blessing because it is in the mind and heart of our scientists, he said.</p>
<p>The global arrogance have resorted to hue and cry to force us to give up our legitimate rights, underlined president Ahmadinejad.</p>
<p>After the world war II, the triumphant countries draw up a new relations to govern and dominate the whole world in order to plunder the wealth and natural resources of the world nations, said the Iranian president.</p>
<p>He said the reason why they create obstacles on our path of success and developments.</p>
<p>&#8220;The enemies for many times threaten to take military action against Iran to urge us suspend our nuclear program but to no avail&#8221;, said the president.</p></blockquote>
<p>At a <a href="http://www2.irna.com/en/news/view/line-24/0804082812124149.htm" target="_blank">later event</a>, Ahmadinejad also stated:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;In addition to installation of 6,000 new centrifuges, there are also reports about other new achievements which would be announced tonight at TV news program,&#8221; Ahmadinejad said.</p></blockquote>
<p>With these advancements, I don&#8217;t think that there is anyone that can argue Iran&#8217;s threat to the West, but more importantly one of our closest allies, Israel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dcrepublican.com/2008/04/09/iran-announces-massive-increase-in-nuclear-capabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

